to be acting strenuous in compliance
with your instructions
6. de Eitel protested against his final dismissal from the subject with regard to the allegations affecting der Hayllan, which he maintains were incorrect when your authority, by the alleged pact of your having in the meantime submitted a paper (32) withdrawing the substance of the charges against Mr Haglar. He also implies that this paper was one of the considerations for the withdrawal of the action, which ostensibly was made to depend upon de Eitel's withdrawal alone.
These statements are not rebutted by you, but not...
to be acting feroushoal in compliance
your instructions
\ with
6. de Eitel prtificer
his final demal
of the subicancial
with of the allegations affecting der Hayllan,
which he maintanis maintains
rected when your
authority, by the
| alleged pact of your
having in the meantime
segued a paper
32
withdrawing the
substance of the
charges agamas
Mr Haglar. He also implies thal
this paper was one
of the consideration, for the withdrawal of the action, which
ostensibl
was
made to depend
Eitali
upon of Extel's
there aduc pocon's alone.
There statemenes
are not rebated
by you, but not
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.